Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramya Tumkur Guruchannabasappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramya Tumkur Guruchannabasappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Bangalore ITAT Deletes ₹10 Lakh Addition Caused by DRP’s Typographical Error- AO Cannot Sustain Addition Contrary to DRP’s Intent The Bangalore ITAT held that the Assessing Officer wrongly retained an addition of ₹10 lakh due to a typographical error in the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) directions. The draft assessment order had made additions aggregating to ₹3,38,25,770 under section 69. Although the DRP intended to direct deletion of the entire addition, its order mistakenly mentioned ₹3,28,25,770 instead of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031