Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. R. P. Patel Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 4. Question Nos. 2 to 6 pertain to one and the same issue, that is, whether IVP is a capital asset or not. It is seat from the orders of the Tribunal that investment in IVP is assessed in the case of the assessee as unexplained investment only to the extent of fresh investment made in the respective year and reinvestment after encashment of earlier deposits was in tact allowed. The assessee’s claim that IVP is a capital asset is only for the purpose of evading payment of interest accrued on yearly basis in accordance with the scheme of IVP. The specific contention rais...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930