Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs Mr. Peter Savio Pereira (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 483 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/11/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pr. CIT Vs Mr. Peter Savio Pereira (Bombay High Court)

The Tribunal notices that the assessee had received sale consideration partly in cash and partly in form of new flats to be constructed and to be allotted to the assessee. The Tribunal, therefore, correctly came to the conclusion that the assessee’s investment in such new flats amounts to investment for acquisition of new residential house. The Tribunal, therefore, correctly held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in disallowing the exemption under Section 54 of the Act. No question of law arises. Tax Appeal, therefore, dismissed.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1. Revenue has filed this appeal against the judgment of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“Tribunal” for short) dated 27th February, 2015.

2. Following question is pressed before us :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031