Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income-Tax Vs P.D. Singhania (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
From a reading of the clauses (a) and (b) of the Explanation to section 10(13A), which were inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1976, it is absolutely clear that in order to claim deduction under sub-section (13A) of section 10, the assessee should not reside in the accommodation which is owned by him and further, the expenditure should have been actually incurred on payment of rent. As in the instant case, the assessee was residing in his own house and there was no payment of rent, the provisions of sub-section (13A) of section 10 were not at...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930