S. 40(a)(iii): No specified period for TDS deposit in claiming salary expenses
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

S. 40(a)(iii): No specified period for TDS deposit in claiming salary expenses

Case Law Details

Case Name
ANZ Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
1991-92
Advertisement
Brief of the Case Delhi High Court held In the case of ANZ Grindlays Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT that absence of a provision similar to sec. 40(a) (i) does not mean that the Assessee would also be disentitled to claim deduction on account of salaries in the year to which such expenses pertained even though the Assessee has subsequently discharged its obligation to deposit the tax. In our view, this added condition that the tax must be deducted and paid within time, cannot be read in Section 40(a) (iii). The plain language of the Section 40(a) (iii) does not permit such interpretation. If the parliament...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *