Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunrise Foods Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 21982 to 21987 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/05/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sunrise Foods Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC) (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Liability of Purchase Tax under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Value-added Tax Act, 2006 was not attracted in case assessee’s turnover was also below Rs. 300 Cr

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. pandiarajan says:

    Sir,
    This decision is against the High court Madras decision in Tax Case (Revision) Nos. 3, 4 & 5 of 2015THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
    and
    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR DATED : 06.12.2018 . Since this decision is a bench decision this is being followed by the department.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
September 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30