Case Law Details

Case Name : Bacardi India (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner State Tax (Joint Commissioner (Appeal), State Tax, Haldani)
Appeal Number : Appeal Number: 24/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/11/2020
Related Assessment Year :

Bacardi India (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner State Tax (Joint Commissioner (Appeal), State Tax, Haldani); Appeal Number: 24/2020; Date of Decision: 21/11/2020

Uttarakhand GST Appellate authority sets aside penalty order under section 129 for minor error in e waybill. In the E way bill Invoice Number was mentioned instead of Bill of Entry number.

Joint Commissioner (Appeal), State-Tax, Haldwani, in light of Circular No.- 64/38/2018; Dated 14-09-2018 quashed the order of Assitant commissioner demanding integrated tax and Penalty of Rs 1,29,915 each under section 129 and instead levied a general penalty of Rs 1,000/- on the Appellant.

The honorable Authority made the following major observations in this regard:

1) Section 129(3) shall be invoked if E way Bill or Invoice/ Bill of entry/ Delivery Challan/ Bill of Supply are not available with vehicle.

If these documents are available with the vehicle Section 129(3) can not be invoked.

2) It is mandatory for the proper officer to set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision in his order.

3) Imposing penalty for Human or technical errors is not justified.

Download Judgment/Order

Author Bio

Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: N H Singhal & Associates
Location: Delhi, Uttarakhand, India
Member Since: 05 Mar 2018 | Total Posts: 24
GST Corporate Advisor | GST Trainer | Indirect Tax Expert View Full Profile

My Published Posts

More Under Goods and Services Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

September 2021