Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maya Pradeep Kumar Vs Audit Officer (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Maya Pradeep Kumar Vs Audit Officer (Kerala High Court)

In the case of Maya Pradeep Kumar vs. Audit Officer, the petitioner approached the Kerala High Court challenging a show cause notice (Ext.P4) issued under Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts. The petitioner argued that although they responded to all audit queries during the audit process, the final audit report (Ext.P3) ignored these submissions, leading to the issuance of the show cause notice.

The petitioner contended that there was no valid basis to initiate proceedings un

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Olivia Green says:

    An important ruling that reinforces procedural fairness in GST proceedings. The Kerala HC’s direction for proper replies to Section 74 notices serves as a crucial reminder that tax authorities must follow due process, even in cases of alleged evasion.

    This decision particularly highlights:

    The necessity of clear communication from tax departments

    The right of taxpayers to proper responses to their submissions

    The judiciary’s role in maintaining balance in tax administration

    Would be interesting to see if this sets a precedent for similar cases across other states. The article could potentially benefit from including the specific timeline given by the HC for the adjudicating authority’s response.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930