Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abhyuththan Gram Vikas Mandal Vs Union of India & Ors. (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 9470 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/10/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Abhyuththan Gram Vikas Mandal Vs Union of India & Ors. (Gujarat High Court)

The applicant was before the Honourable High Court of Gujarat, in a writ, against an ex-parte order. During the pendency of such a writ, the respondent had initiated the recovery proceedings by intimating the debtors of the applicant restricting the payment of the applicant.

Such a recovery letter was also not shared with the applicant, even after being requested on multiple occasions, and hence the applicant was compelled to file an application for getting direction of the Honourable Court to bring such a document on record by the respondent and also prayed for stay of operation of such recovery proceeding.

The Honourable High Court of Gujarat while appreciating the ex-parte order and considering the balance of convenience has granted the stay on such recovery proceeding.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Anandodaya S.Mishra for the applicant-original petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shrunjal Shah for the respondent Nos. 2,3 and 4.

2. This application is filed during the pendency of the petition as the respondents have initiated the recovery proceedings by intimating the debtors of the applicant restricting the payment of the applicant.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shah has placed on record the letter in FORM GST-DRC-13 dated 19th June, 2024, the same is taken on record.

4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the order-in- original in FORM DRC-07 is passed on 28th February, 2024 without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner though prayed for by the petitioner in reply dated 26th February, 2024.

5. Hence we are of the opinion that the petitioner has a very good prima facie case and the balance of convenience is also in favour of the petitioner and if the respondents are not restrained from the recovery proceedings, it would result into irreparable loss to the petitioner

6. In view of the above, the respondents are restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioner during the pendency of this petition.

7. The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. The main matter to be listed for further hearing on 30th October, 2024.

Sponsored

Author Bio

As a Counsel, his focus areas of practice are Arbitration, GST/indirect tax, Customs, International Laws, Regulatory, Data Privacy, Employment Laws & White collar crimes. As a strategic advisor, he has a rich experience in M&A, Joint ventures, Due Diligence and Cross border transactions. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 17(5)(c) & (d) of CGST Act, 2017- Post-Safari Retreats Judgment SEZ Unit Entitled To Claim Refund of Unutilized ITC Seizure Memo of DRI devoid of reasons liable to be Quashed & Set Aside Show Cause Notice Devoid of Reasons and Vague is Bad in Law Advertisement, Marketing & Promotion Expense- Controversy View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930