Case Law Details

Case Name : Shubham Marketing, Bharat Ram Raj Kumar & Co. Vs. Commissioner Value Added Tax [2015 (5) TMI 563 - DELHI HIGH COURT]
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
 CA Bimal Jain

In the instant case, Shubham Marketing and Bharat Ram Raj Kumar & Co. (“the Petitioners”) have filed Writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi seeking to quash default Notices of assessment of penalty in Form DVAT-24A issued under Section 33 of the DVAT Actfor non-filing of Stock Statement online in Form Stock-I.

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi held that imposition of fine under Section 70(5) of the DVAT Act is for an “offence” as defined under Section 3(38) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 which shall be tried by the Hon’ble Court of criminal jurisdiction in accordance with Section 26(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Commissioner or its delegates do not have power or jurisdiction to impose such fine.

(Bimal Jain, FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons),  Email:

Click Read Other Articles from CA Bimal Jain

Author Bio

More Under Goods and Services Tax

Posted Under

Category : Goods and Services Tax (8446)
Type : Articles (18575)
Tags : CA Bimal Jain (700) high court judgments (4792)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *