Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Calcutta HC directs SGST Authority to Await CGST Adjudication

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 397
Case Name
Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia, Proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Casting & Eng. Co. Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia, Proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Casting & Eng. Co. Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)

Introduction: The case of Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia, the proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Casting & Eng. Co., against the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax is under scrutiny. The petitioner filed an appeal challenging the order denying interim relief. The focus is on Discrepancy No. 3 highlighted in the audit memo. The petitioner contends that a show cause notice by the anti-evasion wing of CGST is already under adjudication, and the State GST Authority should await its resolution.

Detailed Analysis: The appellant received an audit memo pointing out various discrepancies, with a specific concern regarding Discrepancy No. 3. The petitioner informed the SGST Authority about an ongoing show cause notice by the CGST anti-evasion wing covering the mentioned points. Despite the reply submitted to the CGST Authority, the State GST Authority was not convinced that Discrepancy No. 3 had been settled.

The audit wing of the State GST Authority proceeded to issue a show cause notice dated 29.12.2023. The petitioner argues that since Discrepancy No. 3 is already under adjudication by the CGST Authority through the show cause notice dated 28.03.2023, the SGST Authority should keep all proceedings, including the latest show cause notice, in abeyance. The petitioner urges alignment with the adjudication order from the CGST Authority.

Conclusion: The Calcutta High Court has directed the SGST Authority to put on hold all proceedings related to Discrepancy No. 3, including the show cause notice dated 29.12.2023. The court emphasizes the importance of awaiting the adjudication order from the CGST Authority, represented by the fourth respondent, based on the show cause notice dated 28.03.2023. This ensures a coordinated and aligned resolution process for the pending matters, providing clarity and fair consideration for the petitioner.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

1. The appeal filed by the petitioner is directed against the order dated 5th December, 2023 passed in WPA 26410 of 2023 by which the learned Single Bench declined to grant any interim relief. At the request of the learned advocates for the either side, the appeal and the writ petition are taken up for disposal by a common order and judgment.

2. The appellant was issued an audit memo in which several discrepancies have been pointed out and in this appeal and writ petition we are concerned about discrepancy. The assessee on receiving the said audit notice informed the SGST Authority that over the same issue a show cause notice has been issued by the anti-evasion wing of CGST Department dated 28th March, 2023 for the financial years 2017-2018 to 2021-2022 wherein all the points as mentioned in the audit memo have been considered and the same is under adjudication. The assessee has given a reply to the said show cause notice on 4th May, 2023 and the matter is now pending adjudication before the fourth respondent. Over such reply given by the assessee the audit wing of the State GST Authority was of the opinion that it is not clear from the reply given by the appellant/assessee that discrepancy no.3 has been settled. The audit authority has failed to take note of the submission made by the assessee and the subject matter is pending adjudication by the CGST Authority, namely, the fourth respondent, who has issued the show cause notice dated 28.3.2023 which reply has been submitted by the appellant/assessee on 2nd May, 2023. Therefore, the audit wing of the State GST Authority ought to keep the matter abeyance so far as the discrepancy note is concerned. The authority now has issued a show cause notice dated 29.12.2023 since the discrepancy note no.3 pointed out by the Audit Wing of the State GST authority is the subject matter of adjudication of CGST Authority. Pursuant to the show cause notice dated 28.03.2023 the audit wing of the SGST Authority should not proceed. Accordingly, the appeal along with the connected application and the writ petition are disposed of by directing the audit wing of the SGST Authority to keep in abeyance all proceedings in respect of the discrepancy note no.3 alone including the show cause notice dated 29.12.2023 and abide by the adjudication order to be passed by the CGST Authority , namely, the fourth respondent on the show cause notice dated 28.03.2023.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,887

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.