Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Unnathi HR Solutions (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 21/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Unnathi HR Solutions (GST AAR Karnataka)

The issue before us is the admissibility/maintainability of the instant application and the said admissibility is governed by the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as under:

“The Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of applicant under any provisions of this Act”.

Thus the conditions to be considered before admission of application, on the basis of above proviso are as under:

i. Whether the question raised is pending or decided in any proceedings.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031