Case Law Details
Case Name : Orion Appliances Ltd. Vs. CST (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Sponsored
Court: CESTAT (Ahmedabad Bench)
Citation: Orion Appliances Ltd. Vs. CST Ahmedabad 2010-VIL-10-CESTAT-AHM
Background- Since the inception of Cenvat Credit Rules, there has been a debate on the application of Cenvat Credit Rules viz a viz trading activity. The Cenvat Credit Rules do not have any provision to govern a situation where common ‘inputs’/ ‘input services’ are used by an assessee engaged in providing output service/ manufact
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
We would like to comment on the above that we are the Registered dealer and pass on the
CENVAT to Buyer. if it is trading activity then during the activity we are charged the
commission on sales/trading of goods and hence we have to pay the service tax on commission as Business Auxiliary Service if we are service provider then we can availe the service tax
on inputs service. of GTO inward , Courier,Banks,telephone,import service, Clearing & Forwarding etc.