Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Rajhans Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M/s. Rajhans Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal of the firm and set aside the duty demand and the penalty; however, penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on the Managing Partner of the appellant-firm was upheld on the ground that no separate appeal has been filed by the Managing Partner. He further submitted that the Commissioner (A) has wrongly held that there is no concept of joint appeal and the Managing Partner has to separately file an appeal under Rule 3(1) and (2) of the sub-rules. It is his fur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930