Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Rajhans Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : E/20293/2018-SM
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Rajhans Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal of the firm and set aside the duty demand and the penalty; however, penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on the Managing Partner of the appellant-firm was upheld on the ground that no separate appeal has been filed by the Managing Partner. He further submitted that the Commissioner (A) has wrongly held that there is no concept of joint appeal and the Managing Partner h

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31