Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Excess amount paid by appellant is merely a deposit not a duty; Refund allowable

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pearl Drinks Limited Vs C.G. & S.T. Jammu (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Pearl Drinks Limited Vs C.G. & S.T. Jammu (CESTAT Chandigarh) It is a fact on record that at the time of clearance of goods, the appellant paid duty and claim refund thereof only, there is a Cenvat credit relying in Cenvat credit account unutilized due to return of goods already cleared by the appellant on payment of duty. In these circumstances, I hold that the appellant is entitled for refund of duty paid in cash at the time of clearance of goods as held by this Tribunal in the case of Shree Nath Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu. FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT CHANDIGARH ORD...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *