This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SAD Refund Cannot Be Rejected for Invoice Endorsement Defects: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Cape Electric Corporation Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Cape Electric Corporation Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Based on the CESTAT Chennai order in Cape Electric Corporation Vs Commissioner of Customs, the Tribunal examined whether SAD refund claims under Notification No.102/2007-Cus. could be denied solely due to absence or variation of endorsement in certain sales invoices, particularly when the original refund records had been misplaced by the department.
The appellant had filed three SAD refund claims totaling ₹18,82,526 in relation to imports covered by 27 Bills of Entry. The claims were initially rejected on the ground that t...






