This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 114 Penalty set aside as no fraudulent export evidence recorded: CESTAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Saurav Chopra Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Saurav Chopra Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that penalty under section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be imposed in the absence of any evidence that there was fraudulent export of goods. Accordingly, appeal allowed and penalty set aside.
Facts- Saurabh Chopra has filed this appeal for quashing the order dated 30.08.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Custom (Appeals) upholding the order dated 31.01.2017 passed by the Joint Commissioner imposing a penalty of Rs.5 Lakhs upon the appellant u/s. 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. Notably, Shri Saurav ...






