Sponsored

No Forfeiture of Security Deposit for declaration Non-Filing as per Circular 16/2009-Customs

POONAM GANDHI 09 Apr 2025 330 Views 0 comment Print Custom Duty | Judiciary

Case Law Details

Case Name : East West Freight Carriers Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) (CESTAT Mumbai)

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai

Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sponsored

East West Freight Carriers Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT Mumbai held that failure to file declaration detailing particulars of supplier of goods as prescribed in circular no. 16/2009-Customs dated 25th May 2009 is technical irregularity. Hence, revocation and of security deposits under regulation 14 of Custom

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Cestat judgments

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: POONAM GANDHI

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India

Member Since: 14 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 8499

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Urban Improvement Trust being State within Article 289(1) not covered under Income Tax Act Set-off on furnace oil available after reducing 6% of purchase price u/r 41D(3)(a) of Bombay Sales Tax Rules Notification 12/2012-Cus. benefit allowed to Coke Breeze as used for metallurgical purpose only Late filing of audit report doesn’t disentitle trust from benefit of exemption u/s. 11 Unaccounted commission addition without corroborative evidence is not sustainable View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Penalties for not Maintaining Documents for Specified Domestic Transactions

Tax Treatment of Gifts Received By an Individual or HUF: Rules & Exceptions

Section 54 Exemption for Capital Gains on Residential Property Transfer

E-Payment of Direct Taxes: Simplifying Tax Payments

Comprehensive Guide: Tax Treatment of Dividends Received

Section 263 Set Aside for Relying on Uncorroborated Dumb Documents From Third-Party Search

Section 270A penalty cannot survive if underlying quantum addition is deleted

No Satisfaction, No Penalty: ITAT Delhi Quashes 271DA Penalty

ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition for Recorded Business Cash Deposits during Demonetisation

CAs a Soft Target: Officer Overreach in GST Probe & Why CAs Cannot Be Treated as Accused in Tax Investigations

Sponsored

Ads Free tax News and Updates

Penalties for not Maintaining Documents for Specified Domestic Transactions

Tax Treatment of Gifts Received By an Individual or HUF: Rules & Exceptions

Section 54 Exemption for Capital Gains on Residential Property Transfer

E-Payment of Direct Taxes: Simplifying Tax Payments

Section 263 Set Aside for Relying on Uncorroborated Dumb Documents From Third-Party Search

CAs a Soft Target: Officer Overreach in GST Probe & Why CAs Cannot Be Treated as Accused in Tax Investigations

Behind Bars, But Not Beyond Justice: Ex-Parte Orders Set Aside as Assessee Was in Prison

No 143(1) Show-Cause Issued: ITAT Quashes ₹5.73 Cr Demand for TDS Mismatch

ITAT Deletes ₹5.89 Cr Addition, Retains ₹25 Lakhs: Cash Sales Not Taxable Under 68/115BBE

No Evidence, No Rigging, No Bogus LTCG – Penny-Stock Theory Fails

View All Featured Posts

Sponsored

Cost Inflation Index – Meaning & Index from 1981-82 to 2024-25

Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses with FAQs

Income Tax audit under section 44AB: FAQs

Section wise Income Tax Deductions for AY 2026-27/ FY 2025-26

Clubbing of Income under Income Tax Act, 1961 with FAQs

Tax Deducted at Source (TDS): FAQs

Tax Benefits Available to Senior Citizens

Capital Gain – All you want to know

Permanent Account Number (PAN)

Profits and Gains from Business & Profession- Brief Study

Search Post by Date