Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Crushing and screening iron ore classified as iron ore fines, exempt from CVD

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2022 taxguru.in 2447
Case Name
Amba River Coke Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Amba River Coke Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)

Held that the process of crushing and screening iron ore classified as iron ore fines which were entitled to the benefit of exemption from payment of CVD.

Facts- The appellant engaged in the manufacture of iron ore pellets. One of the raw materials required for the same is iron ore fines. The dispute in the instant appeal relates to the 18 consignments of iron ore fines imported by the appellant from Vale International SA, Switzerland, which had described the goods as Iron ore Carajas Sohar (iron ore fines).

The appellant classified the iron ore fines under CTI 2601 11 31 and claimed exemption from payment of CVD in terms of the notification dated 17.03.2012, which grants complete exemption from payment of excise duty to “ores”. In the course of the investigation, statements of the personnel of the appellant and the Custom House clearing agent were recorded. A show-cause notice dated 20.05.2016 was issued stating that the appellant was not entitled for exemption under entry no. 56 of the notification dated 17.03.2012.

Conclusion- Held that the process of crushing and screening undertaken on Iron Ore after they have been mined at Carajas, Brazil and subsequent blending at Oman with 5-10% iron ore concentrate would result in classification of the goods imported under CTI 2601 11 31 as Iron Ore fines which were entitled to the benefit of exemption from payment of CVD under the notification dated 17.03.2012 and set aside the impugned order passed by the Principal Commissioner. The appeal was allowed.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT MUMBAI ORDER

M/s. Amba River Coke Ltd.1 has filed this appeal to assail the order dated 30.11.2016 passed by the Principal Commissioner, Customs (Preventive) Mumbai 2 , adjudicating the two show cause notices, both dated 20.05.2016, issued to the appellant and M/s. JSW Steel Limited. The present appeal concerns the notice issued to the appellant only. The order holds that 9,43,614 MT of Iron Ore concentrate valued at Rs. 5,26,12,34,168/- imported under 18 Bills of Entry are classifiable under Customs Tariff Item3 2601 11 50 of the Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 19754 and so the appellant would not be entitled to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of Countervailing Duty5 on the product under section 3(1) of the Tariff Act in terms of serial no. 56 of the Table contained in the notification no. 12/2010-CE dated 17.03.2010. The Principal Commissioner has, accordingly, determined the demand of differential CVD of Rs. 69,32,07,587/- and since the said amount was deposited by the appellant, it was appropriated. The Principal Commissioner has also directed for payment of interest and has also imposed fine and penalty.

2. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of iron ore pellets. One of the raw materials required for the same is iron ore fines.

3. The dispute in the instant appeal relates to 18 consignments of iron ore fines imported by the appellant from Vale International SA, Switzerland, which had described the goods as Iron ore Carajas Sohar (iron ore fines). The specifications contracted, as set out in one of the purchase order dated 24.09.2014, are as follows:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.