Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Akay Conces Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Akay Conces Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi) Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench, has ruled that an assessee must pay a redemption fine for seized goods that go missing while in their safe custody under a supardaginama. The Tribunal allowed two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), setting aside a portion of an earlier order that had refrained from imposing a redemption fine on such missing goods, stating that the goods’ liability for confiscation does not cease simply because they are no longer phy...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930