Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : BEML Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
BEML Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that affixation of MRP on packages of imported goods containing quantity of more than 25 Kgs is not mandatory. Hence, differential duty demand for non-affixation of MRP cannot be sustained. Facts- This appeal is filed by the Appellant-Importer against the Order-in-Original dated 27.02.2015 whereby the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-III has demanded the differential duty on the spares/components imported by the Importer-Appellant since these were in the nature of pre-packaged commodity and there was no MRP/RSP label as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930