Learn how the Madras High Court set aside an Assessment Order dated 09.03.2022 under Section 147 r/w Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 for Shapoorji Pallonji Samalpatti Operator Services Pvt Ltd
Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment in the case of Vikas Sharma vs Additional Commissioner of Customs, addressing penalties on a Customs Officer for abetting gold smuggling. The court examines challenges related to the denial of mandated opportunities under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, emphasizing principles of natural justice. Read the full text for an in-depth analysis and the court’s directive on seeking statutory remedies.
GST Registration denial for Lessor and lessee running business in same premises: HC directs GST Dept to Grant GST Registration & directs petitioner-Company to demarcate the property
Read the full text of the judgment/order from the Madras High Court regarding the withholding of gold imported by Mudra Precious Metals Pvt. Ltd. Without customs duty payment. The court directs the release of goods after the petitioner agrees to pay 100% duty under protest. Get insights into the case and the court’s decision.
Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment/order in K.G.Denim Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, addressing an inadvertent error in 87 shipping bills. Learn about the court’s direction to inspect documents and the timeline set for resolution.
Discover if the pendency of an income tax adjudication proceeding is a bar to prosecution in the Madras High Court case of R. Revathy vs ACIT. Learn the legal principles & implications of the judgment & their effect on the petitioner’s case for an assessed income of Rs. 24,09,170/- for the assessment year 2012-13.
Madras High Court addresses GST registration cancellation, emphasizing language accessibility in notices and suggesting SMS and regional language notifications. Details of the judgment included.
Madras High Court held that initiation of prosecution for the offence punishable u/s. 276CC of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained as proviso to section 276CC grants relief to assessee when tax payable determined by regular assessment, as reduced by advance tax paid and TDS, does not exceed Rs.3,000/-.
Madras High Court held that as GST registration sought from retrospective date, the input tax credit ought to have provided. Accordingly, impugned order directing to forego Input Tax Credit is unreasonable and cannot be sustained.
Madras High Court held that the CBDT is not empowered to fix the time limit for filing the application for compounding of offences, which is contrary to the provisions of Section 279(2) of the IT Act. Accordingly, CBDT circular dated 14.06.2019 fixing the same is liable to be struck down.
