Madras High Court directed provisional release of Second-hand Highly Specialized Equipment – Digital Multifunction Print, Copying & Scanning Machines imported prior to notification no. 13/2024-2025 on deposit of enhanced duty amount.
Madras High Court held that the entry tax on the goods imported from the other States cannot be more than the sales tax/VAT levied on the goods manufactured within the State. Thus, difference between entry tax paid and local sales tax leviable should be refunded back.
Thereafter, the petitioner lodged objections on 10.03.2022. The impugned Draft Assessment Order was issued thereafter on 30.03.2022 u/s. 144C of the Act. Being aggrieved, the present writ is filed.
Madras High Court held that passing of order without considering the reply and without providing any opportunity of being heard is in violation of principles of natural justice and accordingly liable to be set aside.
Held that the intimations and notices were uploaded in the ‘Additional Notices’ tab instead of the ‘Notices’ tab, and the petitioner, lacking computer knowledge, had entrusted this duty to a local tax consultant who, due to poor health, failed to notice the same.
The case of assessee-company was that originally the assessment was transferred to the National e-Assessment Centre and notices were issued by the National e-Assessment Centre, New Delhi.
Tax Concession on the buses owned by assessee to transport students and staff could not be denied just because the vehicle was registered in the name of Trust and not school as the respective authority failed to see the objects of assessee-trust as an educational Trust.
Light green float glass (tinted non-wired type) should be classified under tinted glass for duty purpose under the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 70051010 provided that the goods imported matched the description of “Light Green Float Glass (Tinted Non-Wired Type).
Madras High Court held that order passed against the dead person, who passed away before issuance of show cause notice, is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside. Accordingly, order quashed.
Madras High Court ruled that only a registered service provider can file for GST refund, dismissing the refund claim by the recipient in Tvl. Norton Granites case.
