DCIT Vs. Hitachi Power Europe GmbH (Madras High Court) The power to be exercised by the Settlement Commission under sub-Section (2C) of Section 245D is within a period of fifteen days’ from the date of receipt of the report of the CIT. This provision gives power to the Settlement Commission to declare an application as […]
whether passing the final assessment order on the same day when the matter was listed for hearing without waiting for the assessee till the end of the working day is justified in law?
Gangotri Textiles Ltd. Vs. DCIT (Madras High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied by the assessing officer is justified in law? In the present case, the assessee did not disclose about the sale of the lands and windmill in the return of income, which was clear from the perusal […]
National Asphalt Products and Construction Company Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court) The issue under consideration is whether sales tax officer is justified in levying penalty at twice the amount of entry tax? High Court states that, under the Act penalty may be imposed for failure to register as a dealer Section 9(1) […]
The issue under consideration is whether the reassessment proceeding u/s 147 initiated to form change of opinion which clearly amount to reviewing the original order of assessment is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the income earned by the Assessees during the Assessment Years in question from letting out of its warehouses or property to lessees, is taxable under the head ‘Income from Business’ or ‘Income from House Property?
The issue under consideration is whether the actual purchase price of a second-hand asset can be ignored by purported recourse to Explanation 3 to Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
Commissioner of GST Vs Checkpoint Apparel Labeling Solutions India Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) We are constrained to observe that the Revenue Department, cannot be permitted to file such frivolous appeals by way of intra court appeals. The documents discussed above and quoted by us clearly establish beyond doubt that the Assessee had been making […]
CIT Vs. City Lubricants Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) Thus, the issue pertaining to the amount of advance received by the assessee, namely, Rs.9 Crores was never the subject matter of the reopening proceedings which is sufficient to hold that the assessment order dated 25.03.2015 to be a nullity. Nevertheless, we heard the learned counsels […]
The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited Vs Ramesh Babu (Madras High court) In the present case, the Personal Accident Coverage Policy has been agreed between the appellant/Insurance company as well as the respondent. Rs.2,00,000/- is fixed under the Personal Accident Coverage Policy. The Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs.2,16,500/-towards compensation. The Tribunal has […]
