As held by Allahabad High Court in Mon Mohan Kohli Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, it is concluded that law prevailing on the date of issuance of notice under section 148 has to be applied.
The captioned matter pertains to import of Black Pepper of Sri Lankan origin, seizure of the same on alleged grounds of over valuation to circumvent a custom notification and the captioned matter pertains to release of consignment under Section 110A of ‘the Customs Act, 1962.
Kaveri Home Needs Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Considering the fact that the petitioner has shown scant regards of the assessment proceedings under the TNVAT Act, 2006, I do not find any merits in the present writ petition. Further, this writ petition has been filed for an order which came to be passed […]
K.Vinodhkumar Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court) Learned counsel for writ petitioner draws the attention of this court to Sub Rule (3) of Rule 86 A and submits that on a demurrer that even if the attachment is for a valid reason under 86 A, the same elapsed on 17.02.2021, on […]
Nag Leathers Pvt. Ltd Vs Muzain Hides (Madras High Court) It is evident that there is a categorical finding recorded by the Apex Court that the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, would apply only to corporate debtor, the natural persons mentioned in Section 141 continuing to be statutorily liable […]
It is now brought to my notice that the petitioner has made certain adhoc payments pending investigation as a consequence of which the attachment of the bank account of the petitioner i.e. Mutharamman Iron and Steels has been lifted. Thus, the challenge to the provisional attachment does not survive any longer and recording the aforesaid, this writ petition is closed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
HC quashed the decision of Disciplinary Board of the ICAI against the Chartered Accountant alleged of committing of misconduct. Held that, the complaint filed is undoubtedly incomplete and cannot be relied upon and was not enquired properly and by following the established principles of law. Further, held that complaints made to the Disciplinary Authority shall be enquired in all aspects with an unbiased behaviour before passing an order and the reasons for forming any opinion is of paramount importance in an enquiry proceedings.
C. Joseph Vijay Vs State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court) HC held that it is difficult to suggest that the petitioner had acted with malafide and with deliberate intention and thus, the observation made by the learned single Judge, apart from being unwarranted, are irrelevant to decide the issue. The order of the writ […]
Twin Disc Power Transmission Pvt. Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST – Appeals (Madras High Court) Whether in some extraordinary or exceptional circumstance, a GST refund application can be permitted to be filed manually? He held that in some extraordinary or exceptional circumstance, a refund application can be permitted to be filed manually and such […]
Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (Madras High Court) Neutralise alleged excess GST payments through credit note as refund application is time barred The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Quest Global Engineering Services Private Limited vs The Deputy Commissioner of GST and Central Excise [W.P. No. 12105 of 2020 and WMP No. […]
