PEETEE Coach Builders Private Limited Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned show cause notice dated 15.12.2020 of the 4th respondent on the ground that the impugned notice is contrary to the circular No.52/26/2018-GST, dated 09.08.2018 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Central Board […]
Reopening the assessment under section 148(2), by officer having no jurisdiction over the appellant, vitiate the entire reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant.
Madras HC quashes assessment orders against Anantham Retail Pvt. Ltd. for tax years 2019-22. Violation of natural justice cited. Learn more.
Assistant Commissioner of Customs Vs Mahadev Enterprises (Madras High Court) The simple prayer in the writ petition is to direct the appellants to permit the respondent to re-export the goods, namely, Unflavored Supari (Betelnut Product) and to issue a ‘Detention Certificate’ for waiver of demurrage and container detention charges. The respondent imported Betelnut Product with […]
The Madras High Court rules that IBC proceedings cannot affect the rights of the Income Tax Department to reopen assessments.
Since the maximum period of demurrage and detention charges waivers could be possible for 60 days, beyond which, there was no scope for such demurrage and detention charges waiver in view of the proviso to Regulations 10(l) of 2018 Regulations, since the said two months period had already been given from 18.11.2021 to 13.01.2022, beyond 13.01.2022, assessee could not seek for any such waiver for detention and demurrage charges.
Order for grant of suspension of sentence or bail were all interlocutory orders and were not revisable under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Criminal proceedings justified on account of wilful and deliberate concealment of true and correct income by not filing the return of income within the time stipulated
Held that the period of limitation prescribed under Section 153 (2A) or 153 (3) is applicable, when the matters are remanded back irrespective of whether it is to the Assessing Officer or TPO or the DRP, the duty is on the assessing officer to pass orders.
Explore Progressive Stone Works challenge against GST Assessment Orders for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19. Learn about discrepancies in ITC, legal clarifications, and the impact on input tax credit.
