ITAT Raipur order on Rajesh Kumar Tiwari vs ITO. ITAT sets aside Income Tax reassessment completed without providing fair & reasonable opportunity
Read the detailed ITAT Raipur order on rejection of S.12AB application under Income Tax Act, directing re-adjudication by CIT(E). Full analysis provided.
Detailed analysis of ABIS Export India Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) case regarding CSR expenses deduction under Sec. 80G. Explore the ITAT’s decision, implications, and legal insights.
ITAT upholds penalty against taxpayer for cash repayment of loans, contravening Section 269T of Income-tax Act. Explore implications and alternatives.
Satpal Singh Sandhu Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) In absence of Sec. 143(1)(a) being read in the above manner, i.e debatable issues cannot be adjusted by way of intimation under section 143(1)(a), would lead to arbitrary and unreasonable intimations being issued, leading to chaos
ITAT Raipur held that delayed deposit of employees share of contribution towards ESI/PF for A.Y. 2018-19 allowed as deduction.
ITAT Raipur restored the matter back to the file of AO in case of disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act as the CA certificate submitted was not as per the prescribed form i.e. Form 26A. Post submission of CA certificate in prescribed form, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) will be vacated.
Dive into an income tax appeal against Commissioner’s order. Explore discrepancies, disputed additions, and ITAT Raipur’s direction for reexamination.
ITAT directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the matter, taking into account the written submission filed by the assessee during e-proceedings. The ITAT emphasized the importance of affording the assessee a fair opportunity to substantiate its claims with supporting evidence.
ITAT Raipur held that ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure without specifying expenditure which was either not incurred for the purpose of business or was not substantiated by documentary evidence/material is unsustainable in law.
