Umeshkuamr Harilal Shah Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is undisputed fact that the assessee is not a manufacturer and the scrap which was sold by the assessee was not from the manufacturing activity. The decision of the Special Bench in case of Bharti Auto Product (supra) was observed that scrap means wasted which is […]
PCIT has given his own observation which amounts to review and change of opinion or review while exercising Section 263 is not permitted by the Income Tax Statute. Thus, the PCIT was not right in exercising Section 263 in assessee’s case.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that exemption under section 10 of the Income Tax Act not available as the said land was non-agricultural land as it failed to fulfil twin conditions for qualifying as agricultural land.
ITAT Ahmedabad assessee has duly submitted banks certificate disclaiming the existence of such bank accounts belonging to the assessee. Hence, addition of cash deposited on such non-existing bank account unsustainable
ACIT Vs ORG Informatics Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee stated that the issue of FCCB is a Foreign Currency Bond issue and it is basically a debt instrument in the nature of loan and all issue expenses related to that are allowable as revenue expenses. This issue is not a public issue but is made to […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of source of purchase and sale of shares thereof remained unexplained and hence concluded that the sale of such shares were only accommodation entry and accordingly addition of entire sale consideration upheld.
ACIT (Exemptions) Vs Grow More Foundation (ITAT Ahmedabad) Regarding the payment made to Chandansingh, the Ld. CIT(A) has observed that the payment is made for construction work on which TDS has been deducted and a fresh confirmation with signature of the contractor and his PAN No. etc. have been submitted and the amount is incurred […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of expenditure in the assessment year 2012 on the reason that company went into voluntary liquation is unsustainable as the company was not into liquidation in the impugned year.
Merely, because the assessee’s PAN number was mentioned as he was the Director of one of the company, the purchase cannot be said to be made by him when the purchase has been shown in the P&L account by the said company itself as well as part of the closing stock of the said company, namely, Iscon Procon Pvt. Ltd.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that expenditure incurred for education of the daughter, who pursued the very same profession in which the father was, doesn’t make the same business expenditure. Father was morally bound to spend on the education of his daughter and hence the same is personal expenditure.
