ITAT Ahmedabad held the Discounted Cash Flow Method [DCF method] adopted by the assessee for valuing the CCPS is legitimate and in accordance with Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules. The AO cannot reject the method chosen by the assessee if it is prescribed by law.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that CIT(A) relied upon fresh submissions and additional evidence filed by the assessee, however, no opportunity was granted to AO to examine the fresh evidences. Accordingly, order set aside and remanded back for fresh consideration.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of interest under section 14A unjustified as assessee’s own funds are far in excess of the investments made in funds yielding exempt income.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that interest income earned by the assessee (i.e. Cooperative society) from deposits with Cooperative Banks shall be allowed as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Understand the Ahmedabad ITAT ruling that payments for certification services by foreign entities are not taxable in India without a fixed place of business. Full order analysis.
ITAT held that agreement to sell coupled with possession constituted a valid transfer for the purposes of claiming deduction under Section 54.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that benefit demonstrated in form of reduced interest rate on account of guarantee, thus, payment of guarantee fee justifiable. Accordingly, TP adjustment on account of the guarantee fee payment to AE deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act justified as revenue duly exhibited the credit entry as sham or bogus and assessee failed to establish genuineness of the same.
Read the full text of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order where the delay in filing an appeal by the assessee was condoned due to CA negligence. Details on the case and implications.
Detailed analysis of Ramanlal Jivrajbhai Patel vs ITO case from ITAT Ahmedabad. Learn about judgments on business expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.
