Gujarat High Court held that since the order passed by the Appellate Authority has attained finality and no demand is outstanding against the appellant, it is unjustified to withhold the seized gold. Accordingly, directed to release the remaining gold at the earlier.
Gujarat High Court dismissed the allegation of sale of High Speed Diesel to various private industries at concessional sales tax without complying with the mandatory requisite permission from the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. The said allegations were dismissed in absence of any evidence.
Gujarat High Court held that factum of non-use and even handing over of tenancy and later resumption of possession was never in knowledge of Corporation. Further, valuation was undisputedly changed. Accordingly, the rate which was applicable at the relevant point of time is applied by the Corporation.
Gujarat High Court held that order for cancellation of registration passed without assigning any reason is a non-speaking order and hence liable to be set aside.
Gujarat High Court held that in absence of adequacy of reasons and its relevancy thereof, initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act is erroneous and hence liable to be set aside.
Gujarat High Court held that the Company Secretary attached with the office of the Official Liquidator shall be henceforth entitled to be paid remuneration in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 30.11.2018.
The reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the information of alleged bogus political donations, has been challenged on the grounds of exceeding the limitation period. The High Court has instructed the Assessing Officer (AO) to refrain from passing the assessment order.
Explore the notable case of Nirajkumar Nareshkumar Lakhyani v. State of Gujarat (SCA No. 6777 of 2023) in which the Gujarat High Court has overturned the Adjudicating Authority’s ruling. The judgement allows the assessee to meet tax obligations in installments, effectively lifting the provisional attachment of their bank account. Learn more about this landmark tax case and its significant implications.
Gujarat High Court held that if the company has ceased to exist as a result of the approved scheme of amalgamation then in that case, the jurisdictional notice issued in its name would be fundamentally illegal and without jurisdiction.
HC set aside the assessment order and held a proper opportunity must be given to the Assessee whenever a Show cause notice or an assessment order is issued and further commented that it is very difficult to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice within 12 hours.
