Where AO had failed to issue notice under section 143(2) before completion of assessment, addition made under section 68 during reassessment proceedings was deleted because issuance of notice under section 143(2) is a mandatory obligation on the part of AO.
PR. CIT Vs Green Delhi BSQ Ltd. (Delhi High Court) The respondent-assessee was to construct, operate and maintain bus shelters. The respondent-assessee was also under an obligation to pay Rs.4.09 crores per month to the Delhi Transport Corporation. The shelters were not owned by the respondent-assessee. The Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No. […]
Rajender Kumar Sehgal Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) When the notice was issued, the assessee was already dead. If the Department intended to proceed under Section 147 of the Act, it could have done so prior to 31st March 2017 by issuing a notice to the LRs of the deceased. Beyond that date it could […]
FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Reliance by the Revenue upon an audit report, cannot be considered as tangible material. This Court is of the opinion that Carlton Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax officer & Ors., (2009) 318 ITR 295 concludes the issue in the present case; the audit objection […]
CIT Vs Macquarie Global Services Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court) It is an accepted and admitted position that the unit in the SEZ had commenced business in the period relating to the Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee had claimed and was allowed deduction under Section 10AA in the Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The Assessing […]
International Lease Finance Corporation Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court has held that non-commercial re-export of duty-paid goods would be entitled to drawback under Section 74 of the Customs Act and that requirement of Guaranteed Remittance was not necessary in a case where the exporter and owner of the […]
A rectification within a month is not necessary but that as many rectifications, as are necessary, for the dealers to correct the mistakes discerned later not merely on account of its errors but on account of the errors, in receipt of inputs or from the buyers’ transactions would also be admissible.
PCIT Vs FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) In the present case, the reassessment notice is solely based on an audit opinion. Having regard to the fact that the assessee’s challenge to the previous year’s re-assessment orders was successful – in FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 2018 (408) […]
In the instant case, the respondent is seeking enforcement of the liability of the petitioners created under Section 30 and 37 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cause of action for the plaint is based on the dishonour of the said cheques. Since, the suit is not based on any contract between the parties, the bar under Section 69 (2) of the of the Indian Partnership Act,1932 would not apply.
Delhi HC to examine validity of Circular No.07/07/2017-GST & Rule 61(5). Challenge on due date for filing GST return and delegation of authority. Next hearing on 12th February, 2019.
