Explore the CESTAT Chennai order in TCP Limited vs Commissioner of Customs regarding the concessional rate of duty on imported coal. Detailed analysis and implications.
CESTAT Chennai, referring to the decision of the Tribunal’s Larger Bench in the case of Chowgule & Company Pvt. Ltd., acknowledged that the condition related to the endorsement on the invoice was procedural in nature. It held that the purpose and object of such an endorsement could be achieved when the duty element itself was not specified in the invoice.
Explore the CESTAT Chennai order against the Commissioner of Customs, rejecting the declared value of imported goods solely based on NIDB data. Learn why the decision was overturned.
Read the CESTAT Chennai order allowing provisional release of seized polyester coated fabric. Analysis of the case against Commissioner of Customs. Full details.
CESTAT Chennai allows provisional release of gold seized from Sree Venkateshwara Bullion, citing balance of convenience and following principles of natural justice.
CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of United India Insurance Co., allowing Cenvat credit for vehicle repairs despite invoices in vehicle owners’ names. Analysis and implications.
Read the full text of CESTAT Chennai’s order in the Hyundai Motors vs. Commissioner of Customs case. Relief granted due to 9-year delay in ADGFT’s customs exemption decision.
Explore the CESTAT Chennai order on whether providing investment advice abroad qualifies as export of services. Detailed analysis, conclusions, and implications.
In a Customs case, CESTAT Chennai instructs the adjudicating authority to verify EODC for Solar Soles Pvt Ltd, potential benefits to follow upon production.
Read about recent CESTAT Chennai order in case of K. Mayakrishnan vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. Tribunal ruled that a Service Tax demand without specifying service category in Show Cause Notice is not maintainable.
