CAAR Mumbai classifies EV VCU/PCU controllers. Ruling rejects 8537, 8543, 9032; classifies as parts under 87089900 (3/4 wheelers) & 87141090 (2 wheelers).
CAAR Delhi refuses to rule on Mondal Traders’ areca nuts classification as the matter is sub-judice. Legal principles and judicial discipline cited.
CAAR Mumbai defers ruling on sweet supari classification due to pending High Court case, application disposed of without ruling.
Analysis of heat sink classification under Indian Customs Tariff for washing machines & refrigerators, based on the CAAR Mumbai ruling for Samsung India Electronics.
Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai, reviews the classification of digital cinema projectors under Indian customs law, analyzing tariff headings 8528 and 9007.
CAAR Mumbai dismisses Viewsonic Technologies’ advance ruling application on data projectors, citing a pending case before the Madras High Court.
CAAR Mumbai denies Audio Distribution House Pvt Ltd’s request for advance ruling on Optoma Interactive Flat Panels, citing prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai ruled on the classification of ViewSonic Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff heading 8471. Case linked to prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai rejects Viewsonic India’s advance ruling request on data projector classification, citing pending appeal before Madras High Court.
Advance ruling on Apple Watch and bands’ classification under Customs Tariff Act. Insights on tariff headings, disputes, and applicability for renewal.
