CAAR Mumbai dismisses Viewsonic Technologies’ advance ruling application on data projectors, citing a pending case before the Madras High Court.
CAAR Mumbai denies Audio Distribution House Pvt Ltd’s request for advance ruling on Optoma Interactive Flat Panels, citing prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai ruled on the classification of ViewSonic Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff heading 8471. Case linked to prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai rejects Viewsonic India’s advance ruling request on data projector classification, citing pending appeal before Madras High Court.
Advance ruling on Apple Watch and bands’ classification under Customs Tariff Act. Insights on tariff headings, disputes, and applicability for renewal.
CAAR Mumbai rules Medical Examination Rubber Gloves under subheading 4015.12 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, confirming classification for medical use.
The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai, classifies Fatty Alcohol Ethoxylates under CTI 3402 4200, addressing tariff and exemption queries.
Detailed ruling on the classification of LCD panels, touch screens, and printed circuit boards in India, affecting automotive infotainment system parts.
Insights into the CAAR Delhi ruling on the classification of mobile phone rear camera modules under CTH 8517, detailing its design, functionality, and legal interpretation.
The CAAR Delhi ruling on Apple’s Pearl Assembly Module Subassembly concludes its classification under CTH 8517 as a mobile phone part, not a digital camera.
