Delhi High Court reviewed the disallowance of ₹7.77 crore royalty expense in AY 2016-17, addressing revenue recognition and matching concepts in income tax appeals.
ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance of cash payment under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act deleted since genuineness of the transactions and the payment and identity of the receiver are established. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing of diamond by cutting and polishing of rough diamond and sale thereof. During assessment, Assessing Officer noted that assessee has made 20 transactions of foreign remittance.
In the instant case, assessee had not filed any return within stipulated time framed u/s 139(1), but had filed the return u/s 139(8A) (updated return) on 31.03.2023 along with Form 67 filed online on the said date claiming FTC.
ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act not imposable for acceptance of cash on transfer of agricultural land as non-compliance with section 269SS of the Income Tax Act was due to bonafide belief.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted by CIT(A) since assessee duly established identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions.
Filing of Form 10CCB required for claiming deductions under Section 80IA before the due date for filing of return of income u/s 139(1) was only directory and not mandatory for the year under consideration.
Assessee, aggrieved by the decision, appealed to the CIT (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of AO. Assessee dissatisfied with the order of CIT(A) appealed before Tribunal.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Gautam Keshavrao Lohe’s appeal due to failure to address defects in filing, highlighting non-compliance with procedure.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands ₹10 lakh donation disallowance under Section 35AC to AO for reassessment. Assessee’s appeal partially allowed for statistical purposes.
