Bisharpara Kodalia Cooperative Credit Society Ltd vs ITO: Kolkata ITAT rules that CPC’s adjustment of Sec 80P deduction pre-April 2021 is beyond its jurisdiction.
The Tribunal recognized the mandate under section 250(6), requiring the appellate authority to state points in dispute and provide reasons for its decision. However, the Commissioner’s order lacked adherence to these requirements, rendering it unsustainable.
Arijit Chakraborty vs ITO: Kolkata ITAT deletes addition made by AO upon capital gains by adopting value of property as per DVO’s report.
Mumbai ITAT sets aside penalty under section 271B, citing previous penalty under section 271A for non-maintenance of accounts in Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija vs ITO case.
Chennai ITAT rules PCIT cannot expand limited scrutiny via Sec 263 in Cholan Paper vs PCIT case. Detailed analysis & conclusion. Read full text here.
Discover Mumbai ITAT order on Capacite Infra Projects Ltd Vs DCIT, analyzing disallowance of non-genuine/Bogus purchases and its implications on tax assessment.
In the case of Mandeep Singh Anand Vs ACIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi ruled that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot add a new source of income without issuing an enhancement notice. Get insights into the case and the tribunal’s decision.
Delve into the case of Paramjit Singh Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its impact on reassessment orders.
Mumbai ITAT ruled no penalty under section 271(1)(c) if bona fide mistakes in original return were corrected during assessment. Full text analysis included.
Delhi ITAT remits matter in ACIT vs Grass Valley India Pvt Ltd case, criticizing CIT(A) for perfunctory defense, lack of inquiry on expenses, and orders fresh determination.
