In re Sarangapani Jayakumar (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant has filed application through online ARA-01 Portal on 21-02-2020. However, the applicant has filed physical copy of the application along with a letter dated 29.01.2021, requesting this authority to permit them to withdraw their application for advance ruling due to the current pandemic situation created by […]
Wipro Enterprises Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the appropriate classification of Hand Sanitizer for the purpose of GST and What is the applicable rate of GST? The hand sanitizers are classifiable under Heading 3808 under the Customs Tariff Act and hand sanitizers are liable to tax at the rate of 9% under CGST […]
In re Ce Chem Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Isopropyl rubbing alcohol IP and Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Isopropyl Alcohol solution are to be classified under Chapter Heading 3004 attracting 12% GST, and if not, what would be the appropriate classification and justification for such classification. Isopropyl rubbing alcohol IP and Chlorhexidine Gluconate & […]
In re Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft ZurForderung der angewandten Forschung (GST AAAR Karnataka) Since the parent company in Germany and the Appellant in India cannot be treated as separate persons but as one legal entity, the liaison activity performed by the Appellant for the parent company is in the nature of a service rendered to self A service […]
In re Spraymet Surface Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) Section 2 (68) of CGST Act, 2017 defines job work as, ‘any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person’. Further Schedule II, in relation to Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017, prescribes the activities or transactions to […]
Renting of e-bikes/bicycles without operator is classifiable under SAC 9973 – Leasing or rental services without operator and rate of tax as applicable under entry Sl.No.17(viia) of Notification no. 11/2017 CT(R) dated 28th June 2017 as amended is applicable to the instant case
In re Durga Projects & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) even in cases where a rectification of mistake application is admitted and a mistake apparent on record is corrected, the original order is not set aside. The original order remains on record and only the mistakes are corrected therein. The principle of doctrine of merger […]
In re Vivaan Ventures (GST AAR Karnataka) (a) What will be the SAC applicable to the activities undertaken by M/s Vevaan Ventures? The services provided by the applicant, as explained earlier is not in connection with the diagnosis or treatment or care for illness and is related to support services for research and is covered […]
In re Dr. H.B. Govardhan (GST AAR Karnataka) (a) Is the applicant eligible to be registered under GST Act? The applicant is providing Business Promotion & Management Services, covered under SAC 9983 and are taxable as discussed at para 11 supra. The applicant being a service provider, as an intermediary, becomes a taxable person and […]
Whether applicant should charge GST @ 18% for providing security guards and housekeeping services to Kuvempu University, Shivamogga? The applicant is liable to discharge GST @ 18% (9% CGST + 9% KGST) on forward charge basis for providing manpower services to Kuvempu University, Shivamogga.
