Case Law Details
Case Name : Bihar Public Service Commission Vs Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Issue – The Bihar Public Service Commission (for short, ‘the Commission) published advertisement No. 6 of 2000 dated 10th May, 2000 in the local papers of the State of Bihar declaring its intention to fill up the posts of ‘State Examiner of Questioned Documents’, in Police Laboratory in Crime Investigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. The advertisement, inter alia, stated that written examination would be held if adequate number of applications were received. As very limited number of applicatio
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
A very serious observation from Suprme Court indicating urgent need to imporve character and moral of peole:
It is unfortunate and very serious issue when we find observations or even apprehension of the honorable Supreme Court that there is possibility of a failed candidate attempting to take revenge from selection boards members/ examiners ..
That it is likely to expose the members of the Interview Board to harm.
The Suprme court was considering matter of Bihar Public Service Commission. This means persons who were interviewed have taken examination for BPSC for various administrative and other services in Bihar. The applicants are supposed to have good moral character – at least certified by some authority at some time. The people concerned are trying to get a senior and responsible post. In such cases expression of such doubts by the Supreme Court is really very serious.
This shows lack of confidence of the Supreme Court judges about charcter, moral and quality of candidates who appeared in examination / or interview etc. A failed candidate of such important examination or interview can take revenge- then what sort of character we can expect if he is selected and is in position to exert power.
With due respect I feel that honorable Supreme Court could have used some other words instead of expressing such serious concern which put a big question mark on character of failed candidates and in fact it put a question mark on evaluation system. Merely becasue of failure, an eligible candidate can be a reason of endengering interviewers life is really very unfortunate.
This apprehension shows that there is urgent need for taking steps to improve moral and character of people, avoid further detoriation. Criminals in power in any manner should not be tolerated.
That is why it is expected from the people concern IN HIGH OFFICES to be fair & FRANK, ACCOUNTABLE and upright in their dealings.
THIS IS WHY THE CORRUPT POLITICIANS WANTS AND ARE UNITED (THOUGH NOT IN PEOPLE’S WELFARE MATTERS) TO GET OUT OF THE PURVIEW OF THE RTI ACT.
HOPE NOW PEOPLE MUST UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF RTI ACT.