Jarnail Singh Vs Madhav KRG Ltd. (Competition Commission of India)
Introduction: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently examined a case filed by Mr. Jarnail Singh against Madhav KRG Ltd. (OP-1) and Punjab Pollution Control Board (OP-2), alleging a contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Informant accused OP-1 of unduly profiting from purchasing pollution dust and abusing its dominant position. Here, we delve into the facts, allegations, and the CCI’s analysis leading to its decision.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background and Allegations:
- The Informant claimed that OP-1, involved in extracting zinc from pollution dust, benefitted unduly due to its dominant position.
- Pollution dust, treated as hazardous waste, is traded in limited entities allowed by OP-2 (Punjab Pollution Control Board).
- Allegedly, OP-1 purchased pollution dust from induction furnaces at low prices, making significant profits.
2. Informant’s Contentions:
- OP-1, with a dominant position, acquired pollution dust at Rs. 8 per kg initially, while zinc’s market rate was Rs. 325 per kg.
- Entry of new entities led to an increase in procurement prices to Rs. 25 per kg.
- The Informant accused OP-1, in collusion with OP-2, of abusing its dominant position.
3. Commission’s Analysis:
- The Commission observed the entry of at least two entities into the market for purchasing pollution dust.
- Procurement prices increased from Rs. 8 per kg to Rs. 25 per kg, indicating competitive dynamics.
- No specific allegations against OP-2 regarding Section 4 violations.
4. CCI’s Decision:
Paid content
Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.
