Case Law Details
Case Name : Rajendra N Shah Vs Union Of India & Anr. (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The Gujarat high court has held that parts of the 97th amendment to India’s Constitution of 2012, which made the right to form societies fundamental, were unconstitutional for usurping state power.
A bench of Chief Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala yesterday held that some provisions of the 97th amendment, which was made law in January 2012 and notified on February 2012, violated the principle of federalism reported the Business Standard and the PTI.
The public interest litigation’s (PIL) petitioner, Rajendra Shah of Consumer Protection Analytic Committee (CPAC), who ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
has this judgment been appealed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court?
VERY IMP DECISION.THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED AMENDENTS ARE RIGHTLY HELD AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.IT REALYY SURPRISING THE LAW MAKERS JUST IGNORE THE BASIC STRUCTURE AND FRAMEWORK OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
CENTRE CAN NOT IMPOSE SUCH LAWS ON THE STATES.
NOW ALMOST ALL COOPERATIVES HAVE AMENDED THE BYELAWS BY CONVENING SPL GEN MEETINGD OF MEMBERS.NOW IT WILL BE WASTE OF MONEY AND TIME.BUT WHO CARES .
good judement by hon.highcourt this action proves judiciary is supreme in india