This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
In winding up hearing Counter claim by way of unliquidated sum in damages is no defence to petitioner’s claim which had been admitted by company
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Re. Brand Value Communications Ltd. (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Brand Value Communications Ltd., In re
SANJIB BANERJEE, J.
CP No. 213 of 2012
FEBRUARY 4, 2013
ORDER
1. The Court – The claim of the petitioning creditor is on account of charges for preparing several episodes of a television serial for the company. The statutory notice of June 15, 2012 claimed that the petitioner was entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,45,000/- together with applicable service tax to be paid after 60 days of telecast of each episode. The soap ran for 317 episodes and the petitioner has received payment for 226 episodes and the claim in the statutory noti...
