Introduction: Ind AS 8 sets out guidelines for accounting policies, changes in estimates, and rectifying errors in financial reporting. It ensures transparency, reliability, and comparability of financial statements over time, vital for stakeholders’ decision-making.
1. Purpose and Scope:
- Ind AS 8 outlines the criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies, along with the accounting treatment and disclosure requirements for changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates, and corrections of errors.
- The standard aims to enhance the relevance and reliability of an entity’s financial statements and promote comparability over time and with other entities.
2. Accounting Policies:
- Entities are required to select and apply accounting policies that result in financial statements providing a true and fair view of the entity’s financial position and performance.
- The appropriateness of accounting policies is crucial in reflecting the economic substance of transactions and events.
Example: If a company follows the revenue recognition policy of recognizing revenue when goods are delivered to customers, it needs to consistently apply this policy for similar transactions.
3. Changes in Accounting Policies:
- Changes in accounting policies are allowed only when required by an Ind AS or when it results in a more reliable and relevant presentation of the financial statements.
- When a change is made, the entity must disclose the nature, reasons for the change, and its financial impact.
Example: If a company switches from the straight-line method to the double-declining balance method for depreciation, the change and its rationale would be disclosed.
4. Changes in Accounting Estimates:
- Changes in accounting estimates are adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that result from reassessing the expected future benefits and obligations.
- These changes are recognized prospectively in the current and future periods affected by the change.
Example: If a company revises its estimate of the useful life of a piece of machinery, the depreciation expense is adjusted going forward, reflecting the revised estimate.
5. Corrections of Errors:
- Errors in financial statements result from mathematical mistakes, misapplications of accounting policies, oversights, or misinterpretations of facts.
- Corrections of errors are adjustments to rectify the errors in previously issued financial statements.
Example: If an entity discovers that it inadvertently omitted a significant source of revenue in its previous financial statements, it would correct this error in the subsequent reporting period.
6. Disclosures: Ind AS 8 outlines the specific disclosures required for changes in accounting policies. Additional disclosure requirements for accounting policies are found in Ind AS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.
Example: Disclosures for a change in accounting policy might include a narrative explanation of the change, the reasons behind it, and the impact on financial statements.
Selection and Application of Accounting Policies
1. Definition of Accounting Policies: Accounting policies encompass principles, bases, conventions, rules, and practices applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
2. Application of Ind AS: When an Ind AS specifically applies to a transaction, event, or condition, the corresponding accounting policy should be determined by applying the Ind AS.
Example: If Ind AS 116 provides guidance on lease accounting, the entity applies this standard to develop the accounting policy for recognizing and measuring leases.
3. Judgment in Developing Accounting Policies: In the absence of a specific Ind AS, management exercises judgment to develop accounting policies that result in information relevant to users’ economic decision-making needs and is reliable.
Example: If there is no specific Ind AS for a unique and complex financial instrument, management may refer to similar Ind ASs, the Conceptual Framework, and industry practices to develop an appropriate accounting policy.
4. Criteria for Accounting Policies: Accounting policies should result in financial statements that faithfully represent the financial position, performance, and cash flows of the entity. They should reflect the economic substance of transactions, be neutral, prudent, and complete in all material respects.
Example: Choosing a depreciation method that accurately reflects the economic consumption of an asset over its useful life.
5. Sources for Developing Accounting Policies: Management refers to sources in descending order: Ind ASs dealing with similar issues, definitions and concepts in the Conceptual Framework, and recent pronouncements of relevant standard-setting bodies.
Example: When adopting a new accounting policy for revenue recognition, management first checks if there are specific Ind ASs addressing the same or similar issues.
6. Consistency of Accounting Policies: Entities must select and apply accounting policies consistently for similar transactions, events, and conditions, unless an Ind AS specifically requires or permits categorization for different policies.
Example: If an entity has multiple subsidiaries engaged in similar activities, it consistently applies the same accounting policy for revenue recognition across all subsidiaries.
7. Changes in Accounting Policies: Changes in accounting policies are allowed if required by an Ind AS or if they result in financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information.
Example: If a new Ind AS introduces a change in the recognition criteria for a specific liability, the entity changes its accounting policy accordingly.
8. Retrospective Application of Changes: Changes are applied retrospectively, adjusting the opening balance of each affected component of equity for the earliest prior period presented.
Example: If a company changes its inventory valuation method, retrospective application adjusts the opening balances of assets and equity to reflect the new method from the earliest prior period.
9. Exceptions to Retrospective Application: An exception exists when impracticable to determine period-specific or cumulative effects. In such cases, adjustments are made to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities at the beginning of the earliest practicable period.
Example: If determining the cumulative effect of a change in accounting policy is impracticable, the entity adjusts assets and liabilities at the beginning of the earliest practicable period.
10. Changes Not Considered Changes in Accounting Policy: Certain transactions or events that differ in substance or are applied to immaterial items are not considered changes in accounting policies.
Example: Applying a new policy to recognize revenue from a product line that was not present or material in previous periods.
11. Initial Application of Revaluation Policies: Initial application of policies to revalue assets (e.g., under Ind AS 16) is treated as a revaluation under the specific standard, not as a change under Ind AS 8.
Example: Revaluing property, plant, and equipment under Ind AS 16 is treated according to the revaluation requirements of Ind AS 16, not as a change in accounting policy under Ind AS 8.
Accounting Estimates:
1. Definition of Accounting Estimates:
- Accounting estimates are monetary amounts in financial statements subject to measurement uncertainty.
- They arise when an accounting policy requires items to be measured in a way involving uncertainty, requiring estimation based on the latest available, reliable information.
Example: Estimating the fair value of contingent liabilities or the useful life of intangible assets.
2. Development of Accounting Estimates:
- Entities use judgments or assumptions based on reliable information to develop accounting estimates.
- Measurement techniques and inputs are employed in the estimation process.
Example: Estimating the provision for bad debts by considering historical data, economic conditions, and industry trends.
3. Reasonable Estimates and Reliability:
- Reasonable estimates are crucial in financial statement preparation and do not undermine their reliability.
- Reliable estimates contribute to the faithful representation of financial position, performance, and cash flows.
Example: If a company estimates the fair value of inventory using a consistent and justifiable methodology, it contributes to the reliability of the financial statements.
4. Changes in Accounting Estimates:
- Changes in accounting estimates may be necessary due to changes in circumstances, new information, developments, or increased experience.
- Unlike errors, changes in accounting estimates do not relate to prior periods.
Example: Revising the estimate of warranty expenses based on actual experience and changing market conditions.
5. Effects of Changes in Accounting Estimates:
- Changes in accounting estimates that impact assets, liabilities, or equity are recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the related item in the period of change.
- Other changes in accounting estimates are recognized prospectively in profit or loss.
Example: If there is a change in the estimate of future employee benefits, the adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the related liability in the period of the change.
6. Recognition of Changes:
- Changes in accounting estimates affecting only the current period are recognized in that period.
- Changes affecting both the current and future periods are recognized in the current period and prospectively.
Example: If there is a change in the estimate of warranty expenses, and it impacts only the current period, the adjustment is recognized in the current period’s profit or loss. If it affects future periods as well, the adjustment is recognized in the current period and future periods.
Prior Period Errors:
1. Definition of Prior Period Errors:
- Prior period errors are omissions or misstatements in an entity’s financial statements for one or more earlier periods.
- They result from a failure to use or misuse reliable information that was available and could reasonably have been obtained when the financial statements for those periods were approved for issue.
Example: Omitting the recognition of a significant liability that existed during a prior period.
2. Types of Errors:
- Errors include mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights, misinterpretations of facts, and instances of fraud.
- They are deviations from the accurate and faithful representation of financial information.
Example: A miscalculation in the depreciation expense resulting in an understatement of accumulated depreciation.
3. Correction of Material Prior Period Errors:
- Material prior period errors must be corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial statements approved for issue after their discovery.
- Restatement is done either by adjusting comparative amounts for the period(s) in which the error occurred or, if it occurred before the earliest prior period presented, by restating opening balances.
Example: Discovery of an error in the recognition of revenue in the financial statements for the year 20X1. If material, this error would be corrected by restating the revenue figures for 20X1 and adjusting the opening balances for 20X1.
4. Treatment of Potential Current Period Errors:
- Errors discovered during the current period are corrected before the financial statements are approved for issue.
- This ensures that the most current information is used to present accurate financial statements.
Example: Identification of an error in the classification of expenses in the current year’s financial statements. The correction is made before finalizing and approving the financial statements.
5. Determining Materiality:
- Materiality is a key consideration in the correction of prior period errors.
- Materiality depends on the nature or magnitude of information, or both, and is assessed in the context of the financial statements as a whole.
Example: An error in the valuation of a minor asset may not be material, while an error in the recognition of a significant liability would likely be considered material.
6. Impracticability Exception:
- If it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of an error, the standard provides an exception.
- In such cases, the entity adjusts the opening balances of assets, liabilities, and equity for the earliest prior period presented.
Example: Discovering an error in the accounting treatment of a complex financial instrument with transactions spanning multiple prior periods. Impracticability may arise in determining the exact impact for each period.
Conclusion: Ind AS 8 plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of financial reporting by establishing rules for accounting policies, changes, and error corrections. Its principles promote accuracy, consistency, and disclosure, fostering trust and transparency in financial statements.
Author Bio
