Armajaro Trading India (P) Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) In the instant case, one of the reasons for limited scrutiny was for the purpose of examining whether the share application money received by the assessee was genuine and was from disclosed sources. It is seen that the assessee had shown an amount of Rs.2,55,94,110 as […]
DCIT Vs Michelin ROH Co. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has a company incorporated in Thailand and offers a number of services, such as, business planning and coordination, engineering services, product research and development etc. to its Indian subsidiary. On offering these engineering services, the assessee obtained a […]
The assessee was required to prove identity of creditors, genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of creditors. The assessee grossly failed to do so. Therefore, in the absence of the supporting evidences regarding claim of unsecured loans, we do not see any infirmity in the finding of authorities below.
In order to facilitate faster confirmation of remittances by the intermediaries, necessary arrangement has been made for foreign inward remittances in the following account:
SCN is disposed of with caution to Mr. Srinivasan Karthigeyan for being more careful in future while handling CIRPs. In case, such repetitive instances are noticed in future, the matter will be treated as wilful negligence and action will be taken accordingly.
State of Maharashtra Vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal (Supreme Court) Supreme Court held that charitable education institutions registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act and/or under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, are not entitled to any exemption from levy/payment of the electricity duty on or after 08.08.2016 i.e. from the date on […]
AMENDMENT TO RULE 30, 31, 31A AND FORM 26Q, 26QB, 26QC AND 26QD AND INSERTION OF NEW FORM 16E AND 26QE TO INCOME TAX RULES, 1962 Vide Notification No. 67/2022-Income Tax (Income-tax (19th Amendment) Rules, 2022) CBDT amended Income Tax Rule 30 and 31A, Inserted new Form No. 16E – Certificate under section 203 of the […]
(1) These rules may be called the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
DRAFT RULES- 1. Short tile and extent.- (1) These rules may be called the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Amendment) Rules, 2022. (2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
DCIT Vs Tirupati Udyog Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) It is the case of the assessee that Section 68 applies only to the credit/ receipts entered in the books during the Financial Year in question and its operation is not extended to other assessment years. This position is fortified by plethora of judicial precedents including CIT vs. […]
