Nazma Naz Vs Rukhsana Bano (Supreme Court of India) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State, and having perused the material placed on record, we are clearly of the view that the impugned order dated 19.12.2018 as passed by the High Court, transferring the proceedings in Sessions Trial No. […]
These Regulations may be called the Small Industries Development Bank of India (Defined Contributory New Pension) [Amendment] Regulations, 2022.
Merely because assessment order is cryptic one without discussing in detail nature of enquiry conducted and evidences furnished by assessee, it cannot be said that order is erroneous and prejudicial to interest of Revenue.
Overlooking the mandatory provision of law in the original assessment is apparent mistake of law which is rectifiable under section 154.
Ajaybhai I Gogia Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) From the fact of the case ITAT observed that there are conflicting judicial precedents on the issue under consideration and therefore, it may be inferred that the issue before us is one in which two views are possible. Further, we note that the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has […]
Niranjan Swain Vs LIC HFL Care Homes Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,85,70,263/- during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2020. This amount of Rs. 1,85,70,263/- includes the amount relating to the Applicant No. 1 amounting to Rs. 1,27,892/-. The above amount that has been […]
Santosh Vs Miraj Entertainment Limited (NAA) The rates of GST on Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was above one hundred rupee was reduced from 28% to 18% and Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket […]
Court is of the view that the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act has been passed in great haste and in gross violation of principle of natural justice as the Petitioner was not given reasonable time to file a reply.
In view of the apparent damage to the petitioning assessee’s manufacturing facility, a moratorium for a period of two months is granted. That is to say that the payment that was due in April, 2022 will not be deemed to have been defaulted and the payment due in May, 2022 need not be paid by the 15th day of this month.
ITAT held that loss from trading in commodity derivatives is not a speculative loss and rightly been set off by the assessee against regular business profits from medical derivatives business.
