Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Advocate Bharat Agarwal

Advocate Bharat Agarwal

Contributing Author
Name: Advocate Bharat Agarwal Qualification: LL.B / Advocate Company: Advocate Bharat Agarwal Location: Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Articles Published: 255 Total Views: 1,118,082
Articles by this Author
Corporate LawNexus between disease & cause of death have to be proved in order to repudiate claim: NCDRC
Corporate Law

Nexus between disease & cause of death have to be proved in order to repudiate claim: NCDRC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawSale proceeds of seized vehicle would be calculated at depreciation rate @ 40% of actual invoice value
Corporate Law

Sale proceeds of seized vehicle would be calculated at depreciation rate @ 40% of actual invoice value

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate Law‘Exceptional Circumstances’ must exist to prevent promoters to compete with other resolution applicants to retain control of corporate debtor in case of MSME
Corporate Law

‘Exceptional Circumstances’ must exist to prevent promoters to compete with other resolution applicants to retain control of corporate debtor in case of MSME

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Fema / RBICognizance taken under repealed law is valid if it is provided by provision of ‘Repeal and Savings’ under the new Law
Fema / RBI

Cognizance taken under repealed law is valid if it is provided by provision of ‘Repeal and Savings’ under the new Law

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawWhen Gratification other than legal remuneration is proved then presumption under Section 20 of PC Act could be invoked
Corporate Law

When Gratification other than legal remuneration is proved then presumption under Section 20 of PC Act could be invoked

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawValidity of will depends on free will, sound mind of testator and circumstances in which it was executed: SC
Corporate Law

Validity of will depends on free will, sound mind of testator and circumstances in which it was executed: SC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawWhere two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted
Corporate Law

Where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawRemoval of stones in gall bladder without consent of complainant is against medical ethics & constitute ‘medical negligence’
Corporate Law

Removal of stones in gall bladder without consent of complainant is against medical ethics & constitute ‘medical negligence’

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate Law‘Deficiency in service’ and ‘unfair trade practice’ both established if party take a step back from its stated position to Consumer
Corporate Law

‘Deficiency in service’ and ‘unfair trade practice’ both established if party take a step back from its stated position to Consumer

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawNCDRC it is not required to re-assess & re-appreciate evidence on record when findings of lower fora are concurrent on facts
Corporate Law

NCDRC it is not required to re-assess & re-appreciate evidence on record when findings of lower fora are concurrent on facts

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawNegligence not established if procedure or risk was explained to the patient: NCDRC
Corporate Law

Negligence not established if procedure or risk was explained to the patient: NCDRC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawProper Legal Procedure for Loan Recovery & Vehicle Seizure to be followed: NCDRC
Corporate Law

Proper Legal Procedure for Loan Recovery & Vehicle Seizure to be followed: NCDRC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate Law‘Sufficient cause’ is a pre-requisite for condonation of delay: NCDRC
Corporate Law

‘Sufficient cause’ is a pre-requisite for condonation of delay: NCDRC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago
Corporate LawNegligence cannot be established if the complainant has neither given the instance of negligence nor adduced any evidence of negligence: NCDRC
Corporate Law

Negligence cannot be established if the complainant has neither given the instance of negligence nor adduced any evidence of negligence: NCDRC

Advocate Bharat Agarwal3 years ago