Landmark ruling by Calcutta High Court on provisional attachment of a cash credit account under GST in J.L. Enterprises Vs Assistant Commissioner State Tax case.
Orissa High Court mandates AO to review Legend Steel’s stay application, emphasizing on judicial discretion over administrative circulars for fair assessment.
Madras High Court rules in favor of Packirisamy Senthilkumar, ensuring fair tax process and correcting procedural errors under Section 148A(d).
In the case of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs DCIT, the Bombay High Court examines the requirement of tangible material for reopening an assessment. This analysis explores the claim of deduction on payment made to settle a class action suit and the court’s decision
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Bombay High Court in the case of Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India. The court strikes down a condition in DTVSV, benefiting the assessee.
Rajeev Bansal Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) Allahabad high court in lead case of Rajeev bansal vs UOI (Writ Tax of 1086/2022) and others by division bench presided by justice sunita agarwal on issue of time barred notices u/s 149 first proviso under amended law (judgment reserved on 15 Dec 2022) has rejected […]
ITAT held that Once cash flow statement is not controverted by the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT[A], the addition of such cash deposit is not valid
CIT Vs Somnath Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) The Revenue in these proceedings admits to the genuineness of the expenditure. There is also no dispute that the Assessee is bound to draw up its Profit and Loss account and balance sheet in compliance with the accounting standards of the ICAI. The learned counsel for […]
Explore the impact analysis of the recent Supreme Court verdict in Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd vs CIT-1 on the treatment of delayed Employee PF Contribution payment under the Income Tax Act. Understand the background, adjustments in summary proceedings, Finance Act 2021 amendments, and the way forward for ongoing litigation.
The controversy revolves around the word ‘derived’ and the word ‘industrial undertaking’. The question is whether the interest paid on delayed payments form part of profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking?
