Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Bangalore Upholds 154 Rectification for Non-Rural Bad Debts u/s 36(1)(vii)

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Union Bank of India (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Union Bank of India (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Upholds 154 Rectification for Union Bank — Non-Rural Bad Debts Deductible u/s 36(1)(vii); Not a Debatable Issue Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s order allowing rectification u/s 154 in favour of Assessee-Bank by treating non-grant of deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for non-rural bad debts as a mistake apparent from record. AO had earlier rejected the rectification plea on the ground that the issue was debatable since bad debts of non-rural branches had to be adjusted against provisions made u/s 36(1)(viia). CIT(A), relying on Karnataka ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *