Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

DDIT(Inv.) Lacked Jurisdiction Beyond ₹5 Lakh Limit – Only Regular AO Can Levy Higher Penalty under BMA

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sadanand Bhalchandra Sule Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.) (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
Sadanand Bhalchandra Sule Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.) (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 43 Quashed – DDIT(Inv.) Lacked Jurisdiction to Levy ₹10 Lakh Penalty Beyond ₹5 Lakh Limit under CBDT Guidelines: Only Regular AO Can Levy Penalty Exceeding ₹5 Lakh under BMA- ITAT Mumbai Assessee filed four appeals challenging the levy of penalty of ₹10,00,000 each u/s 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) & Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (“BMA”) for non-disclosure of shareholdings in two Singapore entities—Manquist Holdings Pte. Ltd. & Aavishkaar Internationa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *