Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Sistla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts : ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Page ContentsRamesh Sistla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Ramesh Sistla Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Proceedings Collapse as ITAT Emphasizes Mandatory Faceless Regime – Jurisdictional AO Has No Power After CBDT Notification Hyderabad ITAT delivered a detailed & significant ruling on the legality of reassessment proceedings post-29.03.2022. Assessee had not filed a return u/s 139. Based on information about substantial bank deposits, AO issued a notice u/s 148A(b) on 23.03.2022 (pre-notification). However, on 07.04.2022, the order u/s 148A(d) & subsequently the notice u/s 148 were bo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930