Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhanu Pratap Gohel Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhanu Pratap Gohel Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Gives Major Relief in Demonetisation Cash Deposit Case – Only 5% Estimated Profit Taxable, Section 115BBE Not Applicable Assessee deposited ₹13.50 lakh in cash during demonetisation (Nov–Dec 2016). She explained that the funds came from earlier bank withdrawals, supported by cash books, bank statements, Hathu account & affidavit citing old age/medical needs. AO ignored these documents & added the entire ₹13.50 lakh u/s 69A, which was confirmed by CIT(A) without identifying any defects. Before ITAT, Assessee proved a clear nexus betwe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930