Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dineshbhai Manibhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dineshbhai Manibhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) AO Accepted Agri Income in Next Year but Denied in Earlier Year Without Logic – ITAT Deletes Addition as CIT(A) Adopted “Whims & Fancies”! Assessee was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 on the ground of unexplained cash deposits of Rs.31.54 Lakhs in his bank account. AO noted that no return was filed & treated Rs.13,52,000 as unexplained money u/s 69A. Assessee explained that he was carrying out agricultural operations on his own land. He produced revenue records (7/12 extracts) proving landholding, sale bills of agricultural ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031